New specification method for thresholds

Posted by tonvoon on 17 March 2008 - 9:07pm in

Overview

The method for defining thresholds via the command line is inconsistent and difficult to interpret. This proposal suggests a different way of specifying thresholds, which will also changes the metrics of performance data returned.

Problem

The current method of specifying thresholds is confusing when there are different checks required. For instance, in check_http, to check page size and time, you can specify -w {warn time}, -c {crit time}, -m {minpagesize}[:maxpagesize], -M {maxage of document}.

Also, note the ways of defining the range are inconsistent. Some alert above the value (time, maxage), some alert below the value (pagesize). This is inconsistent for the same plugin!

So, to check that a web page is returned within 5 seconds, the minimum page size is 10K and the maximum age is 1 day, you would invoke:

check_http -H $HOSTADDRESS$ -c 5 -m 10000 -M 1d

Furthermore, the current specification for ranges in the developer guidelines fails the "obviousness" test: a range of 3:5 will alert if the value is outside that range, rather than inside as you would expect.

Also, the performance data returned by check_http is always time and size. Perhaps you want only time, or you want age as well.

Proposal

Thresholds

This document proposes that threshold arguments are specified like:


--threshold={threshold definition}
--th={threshold definition}

The threshold definition is a subgetopt format of the form:

metric={metric},ok={range},warn={range},crit={range},unit={unit}prefix={SI prefix}

Where:

  • ok, warn, crit are called "levels"
  • any of ok, warn, crit, unit or prefix are optional
  • if ok, warning and critical are not specified, then no alert is raised, but the performance data will be returned
  • the unit can be specified with plugins that do not know about the type of value returned (SNMP, Windows performance counters, etc.)
  • the prefix is used to multiply the input range and possibly for display data. The prefixes allowed are defined by NIST:
    http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/prefixes.html
    http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html

  • ok, warning or critical can be repeated to define an additional range. This allows non-continuous ranges to be defined
  • warning can be abbreviated to warn or w
  • critical can be abbreviated to crit or c

Simple range

The range values have two specifications: simple and complex. Simple ranges are of the format:


start..end

Where:

  • start and end must be defined
  • start and end match the regular expression /^[+-]?[0-9]+\.?[0-9]*$|^inf$/ (ie, a numeric or "inf")
  • start ≤ end
  • if start = "inf", this is negative infinity. This can also be written as "-inf"
  • if end = "inf", this is positive infinity
  • endpoints are inclusive of the range
  • alert is raised if value is inside start and end range

(Note: this may be extended in future for adding multiple ranges using a separator - I think this is catered for by repeating ok=,warn=,crit=.)

This simple range does not require quoting at the shell.

Complex range

Complex ranges are defined as:


[^](start..end)

or

[^]start..end

Where:

  • start and end must be defined
  • start and end match the regular expression /^[+-]?[0-9]+\.?[0-9]*$|^inf$/ (ie, a numeric or "inf")
  • start ≤ end
  • if start = "inf", this is negative infinity. This can also be written as "-inf"
  • if end = "inf", this is positive infinity
  • endpoints are excluded from the range if () are used, otherwise endpoints are included in the range
  • alert is raised if value is within start and end range, unless ^ is used, in which case alert is raised if outside the range

Note that due to shell characters, quoting may be required.

Rules for determining state

Given a numeric value, the state of the threshold is calculated from the following ordered rules:

  1. If no levels are specified, return OK
  2. If an ok level is specified and value is within range, return OK
  3. If a critical level is specified and value is within range, return CRITICAL
  4. If a warning level is specified and value is within range, return WARNING
  5. If an ok level is specified, return CRITICAL
  6. Otherwise return OK

Looking back...

So the check_http example becomes:

check_http -H $HOSTADDRESS$ --th metric=time,ok=0..5 --th metric=size,ok=10..inf,prefix=Ki --th metric=age,ok=0..1,unit=d

I believe this is more readable (I'm interested in the time, the size and the age) and more consistent (I'm alerting above 5, less than 10 and above 1, respectively).

In addition, performance data will only be output if the metric has been specified. So only show time performance data if "--th metric=time" has been specified on the command line. Both warning_range or critical_range can be unspecified - this effectively means "I am not going to alert on this value, but I'd like to be informed about it in the performance data".

Because the specification for a range has changed, the warning and critical parts of the performance data can no longer be guaranteed. There is an additional piece of work required to fix a new format for performance data. However, the basic

label=value[uom]

Will still be valid.

Examples

Other examples.

To check httpd processes are OK if the virtual size is under 8096 bytes. Warn until they reach 16182, but bigger than that is CRITICAL.

# old
check_procs -w 8096 -c 16182 -C httpd --metric VSZ

# new
check_procs -C httpd --th metric=vsize,ok=0..8096,warn=8097..16182

There should always be one and only one 'tnslsnr' process. Otherwise critical.

# old
check_procs -w 1:1 -c 1:1 -C tnslsnr

# new
check_procs -C tnslsnr --th metric=count,ok=1..1

Load averages (1,5,15 minute) should be within reasonable ranges.

# old
check_load -w 1.0,0.8,0.7 -c 1.5,1.3,1.0

# new
check_load \
--th metric=1min,ok=0..1.0,warn=1.0..1.5 \
--th metric=5min,ok=0..0.8,warn=0.8..1.3 \
--th metric=15min,ok=0..0.7,warn=0.7..1.0

Plan

I personally plan on updating check_procs.

The basic syntax is:

check_procs [filter options] [threshold options]

Where filter options are the current -u {username}, -C {command}, etc. This reduces the set of processes that are to be calculated.

The new threshold metrics will be:

  • number - alert on number of matching processes. Performance data returns number of processes
  • rss-threshold - alert on rss size if any matching process is in range. Perf data returns average rss
  • rss-max - Same as --rss, but perf data returns max rss
  • rss-sum - alert on the total rss of all matching processes. Perf data returns rss_sum
  • vsz-threshold - alert on vsz size if any matching process is in range. Perf data returns average vsz
  • vsz-max - Same as --vsz, but perf data returns max rss
  • vsz-sum - alert on the total vsz of all matching processes. Perf data returns vsz_sum
  • cpu-threshold - alert on cpu % of all matching processes. Perf data returns average cpu
  • cpu-max - Same as --cpu, but perf data returns max cpu
  • cpu-sum - alert on total cpu. Perf data returns cpu_sum

There will be C library routines for parsing the threshold values.

There will be C library routines for the collection and output of the performance data.

Terminology

metric
Something that a check is going to be measured against. For example, for disk checks, it could be used or free or inodes_free; for http checks, it could be time [taken] or size; for process checks, it could be cpu or number [of processes] or vsz
range
This defines a continuous range of values when an alert would be raised
level
This is an alert level within Nagios - OK, WARNING or CRITICAL
threshold
This consists of a level with a range

Limitations

This assumes that you are always comparing numbers as the metric values.

There maybe some limitations in the precision of values. All internal logic should use double precision.

If there are multiple metrics, the alert will be on an OR basis, that is, any single metric which passes its threshold will cause the plugin to return a failed state.

Comment viewing options
Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
I think that the new system

I think that the new system needs to address resource limits, too - if for no other reason than that without limits, you don't have percentages. :-}

* Limits may come as autodetermined, supplied by parameter, or both (explicit override).

* Limits may be multilayered. (Example: From the point of view of a sysadmin, the RAM limit is the amount physically built in; from the point of view of a newly started process, the limit is what it can use, i.e., unused + cache RAM; from the point of view of "what can I use right away without changing the state of the system", the limit is unused RAM only; ...)

* Limits may play funny games with signs and min/max. (If you have a 20 MB filesystem, 10% = 2 MB reserved blocks, and 19 MB are currently used, then the point of view of a *non*privileged user on available disk space is min=-2MB, max=18MB, current=-1MB.)

* It may be practical to specify/count *used* resources in the math but *free* resources in the perfdata, or vice versa. (Imagine figures being determined "used for A", "used for B", "used for C" etc. etc., but the charts should depict free resources so as to autoscale better as the total use approaches 100%.)

Posted by bern on 15 October 2010 - 12:23pm